9/15/2023 0 Comments Fma 2003![]() ![]() FMA 2003 has an overall grimmer take on reality and achievement.However, these are points I take from a first run through regarding (what I feel to be) the odd, limited efficacy of the 2003: We don’t catch everything structurally and informationally the first time watching something, and a story feels different the second time through. So don’t take everything I say as a concrete, flawless handling of the topic. ![]() My response would be better nuanced and FAR more accurate with a second watch through, of course. This is just for me to reflect, in fascination, at how 2003′s different writing choices create some different results and effects. None of this is in disrespectful criticism of the 2003, which I did end up enjoying enough I’ll potentially do a rewatch (and some episodes I adore so much I actively recommend them to others, too). Here I’ll mainly write a list of analytical qualifications of how FMA 2003′s storytelling structure differs from Arakawa’s - and consequently how the 2003 anime comes across (to me) as less effective. What I’m writing here are some of the biggest first impressions I take from the 2003. I’m not going to go into everything now, though. There are lots of angles I could look at, both pros and cons, and certainly all have points to talk about in length. ![]() I still have yet to finish the story by watching Conqueror of Shamballa, but before I do so and before I forget to do so, I’m going to post some of my thoughts - more coherently - about the 2003 series. So people saw, in the last few weeks, me liveblogging my first runthrough of the 2003 Fullmetal Alchemist anime. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |